Robotic or open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection as staging procedures for clinically node negative high risk penile cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative and oncologic outcomes of a cohort of clinically node negative high-risk penile cancer patients undergoing robotic assisted inguinal lymph node dissection (RAIL) compared to patients undergoing open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (OSILND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of clinically node negative high-risk penile cancer patients undergoing RAIL at MDACC from 2013-2019. We sought to compare this to a contemporary open cohort of clinically node negative patients treated from 1999 to 2019 at MDACC and Moffit Cancer Center (MCC) with an OSILND. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study cohorts. Comparison analysis between operative variables was performed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival endpoints. RESULTS: There were 24 patients in the RAIL cohort, and 35 in the OSILND cohort. Among the surgical variables, operative time (348.5 minutes vs. 239.0 minutes, P < 0.01) and the duration of operative drain (37 vs. 22 days P = 0.017) were both significantly longer in the RAIL cohort. Complication incidences were similar for both cohorts (34.3% for OSILND vs. 33.3% for RAIL), with wound complications making up 33% of all complications for RAIL and 31% of complications for OSILND. No inguinal recurrences were noted in either cohort. The median follow-up was 40 months for RAIL and 33 months for OSILND. CONCLUSIONS: We observed similar complication rates and surgical variable outcomes in our analysis apart from operative time and operative drain duration. Oncological outcomes were similar between the two cohorts. RAIL was a reliable staging and potentially therapeutic procedure among clinically node negative patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma with comparable outcomes to an OSILND cohort.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Patients with Metastatic Sarcomatoid and/or Rhabdoid Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) dedifferentiation is a highly aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has shown significant treatment efficacy in this subtype. There remains uncertainly regarding the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) with S/R who received ICT. OBJECTIVE: Here, we report the outcomes with ICT for patients with mRCC and S/R dedifferentiation by CN status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review was conducted of 157 patients with sarcomatoid, rhabdoid, or sarcomatoid plus rhabdoid dedifferentiation who received an ICT-based regimen at two cancer centers. INTERVENTION: CN performed at any time point; nephrectomy with curative intent was excluded. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: ICT treatment duration (TD) and overall survival (OS) from ICT initiation were recorded. To address the immortal time bias, a time-dependent Cox regression model was generated that accounted for confounders identified by a directed acyclic graph as well as a time-dependent nephrectomy variable. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 118 patients underwent CN, and of them, 89 underwent upfront CN. The results did not contradict the supposition that CN does not improve ICT TD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.47, p = 0.94) or OS from ICT initiation (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.47-1.33, p = 0.37). In patients who underwent upfront CN compared with those who did not undergo CN, there was no association with ICT duration or OS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35-1.06, p = 0.08). A detailed clinical summary of 49 patients with mRCC and rhabdoid dedifferentiation is provided. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional cohort of mRCC with S/R dedifferentiation treated with ICT, CN was not significantly associated with improved TD or superior OS when accounting for the lead time bias. There appears to be a subset of patients who derive meaningful benefit from CN, so improved tools for stratification prior to CN are needed to optimize outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: Immunotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who have sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) dedifferentiation, which is an aggressive and uncommon feature; yet, the utility of a nephrectomy in this setting is unclear. We found that nephrectomy did not significantly improve survival or time on immunotherapy for these patients with mRCC and S/R dedifferentiation; yet, there may be a subset of patients who benefit from this surgical approach.

Predictors of Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma and Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus is a complex procedure with significant morbidity. Patient selection is critical to determining whether the benefits of the procedure outweigh the risks. In this study, we identified and stratified the risk factors that were associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients undergoing surgical resection of RCC with IVC thrombus. METHODS: We identified all patients with RCC with IVC tumor thrombus (stages cT3b and cT3c) who had undergone radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy between December 1, 1993 and June 30, 2009. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and RFS. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between risk factors and OS. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on the number of risk factors present at diagnosis. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-four patients were included in the study. A total of 45.3% of patients had metastasis at presentation, 84.5% had cT3b, and 90.2% had clear cell RCC. cT3c, cN1, and cM1 were significantly associated with the risk of death. Group 1 patients (0 risk factors) had a median OS duration of 77.6 months (95% CI 50.5-90.4), group 2 (1 risk factor) 26.0 months (95% CI 19.5-35.2), and group 3 (≥2 risk factors) 8.9 months (95% CI 5.2-12.9; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Stratification of patients with RCC and IVC thrombus by risk factors allowed us to predict survival duration. In patients with ≥2 risk factors, new treatment strategies with preoperative systemic therapy may improve survival.

Tumor diameter response in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma is associated with overall survival.

OBJECTIVE: Tumor shrinkage of at least 10% after presurgical targeted molecular therapy (TMT) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients has been associated with better overall survival (OS) outcomes. We characterized primary and metastatic tumor diameter response and OS in patients with metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC) who received preoperative TMT, immunotherapy, or both followed by deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy (dCN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic ccRCC (n = 198) who underwent preoperative therapy and dCN from 2005 to 2019 were identified retrospectively. Longest primary and metastatic tumor diameters were calculated using cross-sectional images obtained before systemic therapy and dCN using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Patients were stratified by tumor shrinkage of at least 10% in the primary and/or metastatic tumors after systemic therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of patient characteristics with OS. RESULTS: In total, 31.31% of patients had only metastatic tumor shrinkage (MTS) ≥ 10%, 8.08% had only primary tumor shrinkage (PTS) ≥ 10%, 32.32% had PTS and MTS ≥ 10%, and 28.28% had PTS/MTS < 10%. The median OS, number of patients with tumor shrinkage ≥ 10%, and International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) scores were similar among the 3 systemic therapy groups (all P ≥ 0.80). Patients with MTS ≥ 10%, PTS ≥ 10%, and PTS/MTS ≥ 10% had significantly longer median OS compared to patients with PTS/MTS < 10% (P < 0.01). Patients with intermediate-risk IMDC scores had significantly longer median OS compared to patients in the poor-risk group. After adjusting for preoperative therapy and IMDC risk group, MTS ≥ 10%, PTS ≥ 10%, and PTS/MTS ≥ 10% were associated with better OS outcomes (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.32-0.73, P < 0.001; HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.98, P = 0.04; HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intermediate risk score and shrinkage of at least 10% in the primary tumor, metastases, or both were associated with better OS outcomes in patients with metastatic ccRCC who underwent dCN independent of the type of preoperative systemic therapy.

Sarcomatoid features and lymph node-positive disease in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The presence of sarcomatoid features and/or lymph node-positive disease may be associated with a worse prognosis in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). We sought to better characterize patients' long-term outcomes with these features compared with those without these features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 300 patients treated for sporadic, unilateral, nonmetastatic ChRCC between 1993 and 2019. Clinical and pathologic features were summarized, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with recurrence. Patients with sarcomatoid features and/or nodal disease were grouped as high-risk in a secondary analysis. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years, 43.7% were female, 29.3% had pT3/T4 disease, 3.3% had sarcomatoid features, and 4% had pathologic N1 disease. Sixteen patients were categorized as high-risk based on the presence of sarcomatoid features (n = 4), pathologic N1 disease (n = 6), or both (n = 6). There were 22 recurrences; the recurrence rate in the low-risk group was 4.9% and 50% in the high-risk group. 10-year RFS was 91.4% in the low-risk group and 34.4% in the high-risk group (P < 0.001). 10-year CSS was 96.4% in the low-risk group and 54.3% in the high-risk group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, sarcomatoid features (HR 5.5, CI 1.5-20.2, P = 0.01) and pN1 disease (HR 16.5, CI 5.3-51.4, P < 0.0001) were independently associated with RFS. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of sarcomatoid features and/or lymph node-positive disease portends a poor prognosis in ChRCC. Further studies evaluating the impact of novel therapeutic agents in these patients are warranted.